Archive for May 2010

*Not* a play — White People at the Road Theatre Company

production photos by Chris Goss

Three actors perform monologues that examine racism in J.T. Rogers”™ White People, presented by the Road Theatre Company in NoHo and currently playing in repertory with Madagascar, also written by J.T. Rogers.

White People offers an insight into the lives and expressed thoughts of three ordinary (Caucasian) Americans. Martin, played by Tom Knickerbocker, is a high powered attorney; Mara Lynn, played by Avery Clyde, is a housewife and former homecoming queen; and Alan, played by Mark Doerr, is a young professor struggling to find his way in New York City. Through heart-wrenching confessions that revolve around the subject of race, they each wrestle with guilt, prejudice and the price they and their children must pay for their actions. Sharing a similar intent to the controversial and award-winning movie Crash (2004), White People is a candid, brutally honest meditation on race and language in our culture.

But unlike Paul Haggis”™ Crash, which features several stories that interweave over two days in Los Angeles and involve a collection of inter-related characters, J.T. Rogers”™ White People – which admittedly was written several years earlier, and first staged in 2000 – feels like three monologues that are utterly disconnected from each other, related only in their common theme. So while the monologues are inter-cut with each other, each exists independently. None of the characters interact, nor is there any culmination or payoff at the end.

At times it feels as if the three unconnected characters are explaining or justifying their values, beliefs and prejudices to an unseen tribunal. Above all, their tirades reveal deep insecurities and expose the gulf between these characters and their peers or children.

production photos by Chris Goss

While the performances are all good, and the writing is edgy, emotional and thought provoking, the best thing about this production is the subtle and evocative sound design by David B. Marling which beautifully underpins the often heart-wrenching text in an increasingly interesting fashion.

White People is not a play; it is merely staged storytelling.

The Road Theatre Company
5108 Lankershim Blvd., North Hollywood CA 91601

WHITE PEOPLE
Runs until Saturday, July 10th, 2010, in repertory with Madagascar.

Performances are at 8.00pm

PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE
The two plays will run in rotating repertory.
Check online for a complete performance schedule

Tickets: $30.00
Box Office: (866) 811-4111

Check their website for **Pay-What-You-Can Nights**

The Road Theatre Company,
located two blocks south of Magnolia Bl. in the historic Lankershim Arts Center, 5108 Lankershim Bl. in the heart of North Hollywood”™s NoHo Arts District.

For further information, call 866.811.4111 or log on here.

ABOUT THE ROAD THEATRE
Founded by Taylor Gilbert in 1991, The Road Theatre Company has amassed more than 130 regional theater awards and is helmed by Artistic Directors Taylor Gilbert and Sam Anderson, and Corporate Board President, Ian Bryce. Celebrated for its commitment to the most meaningful and dangerous of theater missions- New Work for the Stage, The Road Theatre Company also remains committed to community service and is the resident company in charge of the Historic Lankershim Arts Center and its programming. Please visit RoadTheare.org and LankershimArtsCenter.com

Review by Pauline Adamek

Merce Cunningham”™s Roaratorio — Disney Concert Hall

Cathy Kerr, Merce Cunningham. Photo: Delahaye. John Cage Trust.

The late Mercier “Merce” Philip Cunningham (April 16, 1919 – July 26, 2009), an American dancer and choreographer, was at the forefront of the American avant-garde throughout his seventy-year career. He is considered one of the most important choreographers of our time.

Merce Cunningham Dance Company, founded in 1953, forged a distinctive style reflecting Cunningham”™s technique and his radical approach to space, time, and technology. The Company”™s collaborations with groundbreaking artists from all disciplines have redefined the way audiences experience the visual and performing arts.

This weekend ONLY, at the Walt Disney Concert Hall, will be the final opportunity to see Cunningham”™s work performed by the dancers that he personally trained. There are three performances only, on June 4th, 5th and 6th, 2010, respectively.

Roaratorio, 1983 Photo: J. Barrington. John Cage Trust

The 2009-2010 season of Glorya Kaufman Presents Dance at the Music Center presents the world premiere of the revival of Merce Cunningham”™s Roaratorio as part of the Merce Cunningham Dance Company”™s Legacy Tour, a final two-year celebration of Cunningham”™s lifetime of artistic achievement and excellence.

About “Roaratorio”

Of all his collaborations, Merce Cunningham”™s work with John Cage, his life partner from the 1940s until Cage”™s death in 1992, had the greatest influence on his practice. Together, Cunningham and Cage proposed a number of radical innovations. The most famous and controversial of these concerned the relationship between dance and music, which they concluded may occur in the same time and space, but should be created independently of one another. The two also made extensive use of chance procedures, abandoning not only musical forms, but narrative and other conventional elements of dance composition””such as cause and effect, and climax and anticlimax. For Cunningham the subject of his dances was always dance itself.

Roaratorio is one of the most ambitious and large-scale Cunningham-Cage collaborations. The work is performed to an original recording of John Cage”™s complex 1979 composition Roaratorio, an Irish Circus on Finnegans Wake. Cage traveled through Ireland recording sounds in places mentioned in Joyce”™s novel, which were later assembled to form an hour-long piece. Using lines from “Finnegans Wake,” Cage wrote “˜mesostics”™ (poems constructed so a vertical phrase intersects lines of horizontal text) on “JAMESJOYCE,” which were read aloud during the performance, and scored parts based on Irish traditional music””jigs, reels, airs, and songs””that are played throughout his recording of the work. Cunningham”™s choreography incorporates motifs on jigs and reels, a “hopping” dance, promenades and strolls, and folk dances that suddenly expand into huge communal circles.

This revival of Roaratorio is a co-commission of the Music Center of Los Angeles County, Festival Montpellier Danse 2010, and Théâtre de la Ville/Festival d”™Automne à Paris.

Location:

Dance at the Music Center
The Walt Disney Concert Hall (downtown Los Angeles)
111 S. Grand Ave.
Los Angeles, CA USA 90012

Dance at the Music Center email: dance@musiccenter.org
Phone: 213-365-3500

Performances:
June 4th, 5th — 7.30pm
and 6th – 2pm

Tickets: $25–$105.00, plus booking fee

Tickets for the Merce Cunningham Dance Company are available:

– through Ticketmaster Phone Charge at (800) 982-2787 or call (213) 365-3500
– at all Ticketmaster Outlets and online
– in Person at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion Box Office:
135 N. Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA – 90012
Information: (213) 972-0711

For groups of 15 or more, call CTG Group Sales at (213) 972-7231.

To purchase a subscription or create your own series, please visit Dance at the Music Center

Artists and Program are subject to change.

Report by Pauline Adamek

Classic horror revisited – interview with ‘Wolfman’ Benicio Del Toro

wolfman-deltoro

During the 1930s and 40s, Universal Pictures released a long-running series of monster movies, creating a successful niche for the studio. Affectionately dubbed “˜Universal Horror,”™ these films imprinted the studio with a certain stamp of B-grade filmmaking. While somewhat schlocky and sensational, movies such as Frankenstein, Dracula, The Mummy, the Creature from the Black Lagoon and The Wolf Man ushered in a whole new genre of American cinema and set the cinematic standards for horror moviemaking.

Unearthed from the vaults of Universal Pictures, dusted off and re-tooled, The Wolfman is a 2010 remake of the 1941 classic horror film of the same name. This lavish and expensive franchise “˜reboot”™ promises to breathe new life into an old legend.

Set during the late 1800′s in the British countryside, Benicio del Toro (Che, Sin City) stars as Lawrence Talbot, a haunted nobleman called back to his family estate after his brother vanishes. Upon his return to his ancestral homeland, Talbot is reunited with his estranged father (Anthony Hopkins), and sets out to find his brother. Talbot is bitten, and subsequently cursed, by a werewolf and discovers a horrifying destiny for himself.

Also starring alongside Benicio del Toro are Emily Blunt and Art Malik. Hugo Weaving plays the suspicious Scotland Yard inspector named Aberline (a character that also figures in the contemporaneous Jack the Ripper legend). Joe Johnston (Hidalgo, Jurassic Park III) directed the picture.

Benicio del Toro says there was a lot for him to explore with this role. “He”™s an outcast but he”™s still a man with a soul, like the Phantom of the Opera. It”™s a fantasy movie, too, and in terms of acting, you go into these movies and it”™s kind of freeing to do a “˜fiction”™ fiction.”

Drawing on a childhood fascination, del Toro says his earliest recollections of movies and acting were these monster flicks, in particular watching Lon Chaney Jr. playing “˜The Wolf Man.”™ As he explains it, “The monster thing starts with the aesthetics, which I loved, as a kid. Then it goes into a place of how all those monsters were misunderstood, like King Kong and Frankenstein. This is an homage, you might say. With all respect to the original Wolf Man, our approach is to bring it up to a new generation.”

Growing up during the sixties, del Toro was interested in collecting re-released movie memorabilia. “There was a magazine called Famous Monsters. It would come out every month and the covers were these paintings of all the classic movies. The colors and the artwork were amazing. The memorabilia the original movies, like The Mummy, Frankenstein, Dracula – that”™s hard to get. My memories were based on a throwback. And now we”™re throwing it back to the original story.”

wolfman

When asked if there a dark side to his personality that is attracted to a role such as this, del Toro throws back a flippant reply, “Yeah. Why not? I like Heavy Metal!”

According to the actor, it was his idea to breathe new life into the old material. “My manager and I approached Universal with the idea of what did they think of us trying to do a remake. I was doing Che at that time, so my beard and my hair were really long and I think that helped.”

According to an interview in Entertainment Weekly with Rick Baker, who created the make-up for The Wolfman, Baker claimed transforming del Toro posed certain difficulties because he already is a hairy man; “Going from Benicio to Benicio as the Wolf Man isn”™t a really extreme difference. When I did An American Werewolf in London, we went from this naked man to a four-legged hound from hell, and we had a lot of room to go from the transformation and do a lot of really extreme things. Here we have Benicio del Toro, who”™s practically the Wolf Man already, to Benicio del Toro with more hair and bigger teeth.”

Del Toro laughs when he hears that quote, responding with, “I gotta talk to Rick about that. Here”™s the deal, I think he means that I understood those movies, too. Rick and I – we had a vocabulary, we could talk about all those horror movies. As I got into making movies, you can”™t help but trace it back to these movies that I liked as a kid, and then you learn more about it all, as you get older. I remember a few years ago they had a horror movie marathon on TV over Hallowe”™en, and I stayed home and watched them and it was great.”

Del Toro describes the transformation process, recalling how he sat in the chair for around four hours each time. “Rick Baker is one of the best in the world and there”™s maybe no one better to do this movie than him. As he was putting it on, and you”™re looking at the mirror, you see the magic happen, so it”™s fun. Yeah, it”™s not easy to eat or drink during the day. It”™s tough to talk – you gotta take out your teeth. So you have a team of people chasing you around all day, but that”™s okay. The tough part is taking it off. It takes about two hours and it”™s being scraped off. Everybody”™s at home already, sleeping.”

Inspired by the classic Universal film that launched a legacy of horror, The Wolfman brings the myth of a cursed man back to its origins and introduces this iconic character to a new audience and younger generation.

Interview by Pauline Adamek

Ridley Scott on the making of Robin Hood

Robin Hood director Ridley Scott

Director Ridley Scott”™s latest filmic collaboration with leading man Russell Crowe (their fifth) is Robin Hood, an adventure and skirmish-packed tale of one of history”™s most beloved anti-heroes, featuring plenty of Gladiator-style battle scenes, horseplay, archery and sword fighting for Crowe”™s Hood and his merry men.

Scott”™s reported $130 million flick is from a story and screenplay by Brian Hegeland, with story collaboration from writing partners Ethan Reiff and Cyrus Voris. The costume drama promises to present a definitive and historically accurate rendition of how a bowman in the armed service of King Richard the Lionheart came to be known as Robin Hood, the famous archer and outlaw of English Folklore.

[Note: this interview was conducted well before the film's release]
From what we have been shown so far, the story takes an “˜origins”™ approach, beginning with Robin battling his way back from the Crusades through France, including laying siege to a castle in Northern France (the siege of Chalus Chabrol, circa 1199) under the leadership of a somewhat mad and disillusioned Richard “˜Coeur de Lion”™ (Danny Huston). Robin is essentially an archer and mercenary, as are the other crusaders. Rather than being driven by religious convictions, all who have enlisted in the Crusades are under paid service to the King.

Early on in the movie, some backstory is established of a scheme to invade England as devised by a corrupt and treasonous English Lord, Sir Godfrey (Mark Strong), in collusion with the King of France. The dastardly plan is to assassinate King Richard and then undermine the heir-apparent, the weaker royal John, by turning his own feudal Lords against him.

Robin-Hood Russell-Crowe

It is during this historic siege of France that we see that Crowe – known as Robin Longshank at this stage – is mates with two fellows who we later learn are Little John (Kevin Durand) and Will Scarlett (Scott Grimes). During the course of this battle, and Robin”™s return journey back to England, we cut back to scenes that introduce Maid Marian (Cate Blanchett), her father (Max Von Sydow) and also King John (Oscar Isaac).

Robin and his mates return to Nottingham via London and Robin assumes the identity of Robert of Loxley, a slain lord from the French battle whose sword Robin has hung onto, at the behest of Marian”™s elderly Father. This ruse figures in Robin”™s later attempts to protect Nottingham and defend England against France.

The film began development in 2007 when Universal Pictures acquired a script entitled Nottingham, depicting a heroic Sheriff of Nottingham to be played by Crowe. Scott”™s dissatisfaction with that script led him to delay filming. During 2008 the screenplay was rewritten into a story where Robin Hood emerged as an outlaw, with the character of his classic nemesis, the Sheriff (Matthew Macfadyen), reduced to a lesser part of the story. Additionally, Scott dropped the temporal notion of Crowe playing both roles and then Nottingham was re-titled to reflect a more traditional and accessible approach.

Explains Scott, “It”™s a good start. That”™s why the idiot title of Nottingham was initially crazy. You may as well call it Robin Hood. I remember thinking, “˜You”™re going to call it Nottingham? That”™s insane.”™ They”™d have to spend all their marketing explaining what Nottingham is when you”™ve already got a title that”™s known in virtually every territory in the world called Robin Hood. And marketing something – anything – like Nottingham instead of Robin Hood, what”™s that about? With a known title, you”™re halfway there.”

Seeing as there is an abundance of colorful versions of the tales of Robin Hood on television and the big screen, you have to wonder about Scott”™s take on what has come before his cinematic attempt. Scott chuckles at the notion that he is trying to set the record straight on this famous outlaw. “Well, I don”™t really get the green tights. I like Mel Brooks”™ one,” he adds, alluding to 1993″™s comedic Robin Hood: Men In Tights. “But I thought Ivanhoe was probably the best of all Robin Hoods.”

Yet why would anyone want to tell this story once again? Is it because the general public perhaps doesn”™t realize the extent to which the legend of Robin Hood was vaunted in literature, songs and poems from the British tradition? Affirms Scott, “Culture, yes. I spend a certain amount of time in France and I was talking to the French kids. I said, “˜Do you know who Robin Hood was?”™ They go, “˜Oui.”™ So, what did he do? And they said, “˜Well he – didn”™t he take from the rich and give to the poor?”™ Very good. They know. I think Robin Hood is global, don”™t you?” Scott goes on to expound, “Robin Hood is myth or legend or hero or outlaw. Whatever he was – Robin Hood was, I think, definitely a Dudley Do Right just by definition of the period and the idea of chivalry. There was definitely a test toward chivalry in that notion of Robin Hood, for sure. He was fundamentally fair.”

Further cementing his historical approach for his semi-epic, with this story Scott and the screenwriters have taken the risk of shifting the emphasis and expected focus. Rather than the Robin-versus-Sheriff showdowns we”™ve come to expect from the exploits of Robin Hood, instead Scott has employed the history of the era to personify a rival nation as the villain.

Explains Scott, “It is from France – the French,” he insists. “The villain is much bigger in that sense; more important and much more dangerous.”

Scott goes on to passionately state his case. “This Nottingham, this Robin Hood is a fresh look because it”™s real. I like everything to be real. In Gladiator Maximus was made up but I shoehorned that character into a very real sculpture and a very real story. Richard ‘Coeur de Lion’ was the glorious rock and roll, 6″™4″ King of England who couldn”™t speak English. He only spent six weeks in the UK and loved guys and didn”™t like women. But he was glorious because he was always first ‘unto the breach’. He was completely gay, but that was quite common in the time and it was even thought that Philippe of France and he had a relationship.”

Okay, that”™s the history. So what”™s the story Scott wants to tell with his movie? Scott replies, “I just want a good, accurate portrayal of Robin Hood because I think he actually existed. He occurs too many times and is mentioned so often in literature not to be just fiction or legend. So that means that at some point in history, there was a person who they used to refer to as the green man in all those English pubs. Seriously, that”™s Robin Hood. Robin of Locksley. Robin of the Hood – there are many names that occur over about three centuries.”

Scott has worked with big Russ so many times previously, so what is it about this guy? Scott seems somewhat baffled by this fairly predictable question. “I don”™t know. I think we tolerate each other now. I think that”™s what it is. I mean, we”™re very similar, in a way, in the sense of being straightforward. I like Aussies; they”™re very straightforward. And because I”™m Northern, I”™m still like that. I think I trust people that think. I”™m not grumpy at all and people say Russell is grumpy. He”™s not grumpy at all.”

He”™s not?!

“No. If you ask him a stupid question, you”™re going to get a horrible broadside, or he”™s just going to stand up and leave. So, if you go and do an interview, then you better be prepped to ask good questions and don”™t ask anything personal. That”™s all,” Scott asserts.

With the screenplay”™s take on Maid Marian, especially with forceful and chilly Cate Blanchett cast in the role, it seems as if we have a bit of a Joan of Arc meets Shakespeare”™s The Taming of the Shrew storyline”¦

Scott concurs, “Yeah, a little bit. That”™s right. She is not a fair maiden. She doesn”™t like being a fair maiden, because Cate can give as good as she gets and that”™s what she”™s best at. And also, she”™s very humorous which a lot of people aren”™t really aware of. She”™s really almost comical. If she wants to be a comic, she”™ll be comical. And I love to see that her relaxing to that process of being able to play that comedy – Taming of the Shrew is comedy. It”™s a battle of wits and it adds reluctance to the forced union.”

Although this movie takes a stab at historical authenticity, Scott nonetheless makes room for a hard-on joke, as when Marian”™s father, played by Max Von Sydow, comments to Robin, “I awoke this morning with a tumescent glow.”

Scott chuckles to himself, saying “Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah”¦ That was charming, wasn”™t it? It”™s because the son has returned, so it has reinvigorated him. Didn”™t you get that?”

Yeah, I got that.

“Shit, okay. I thought he did it quite well, actually.”

Interview by Pauline Adamek

A Celebration of Ethel Waters — “Sweet Mama String Bean”

Sweet MamaOpening tomorrow night, May 20th, for four performances only at the Fremont Centre Theatre is a musical delight — Sweet Mama String Bean: A Celebration of Blues Woman Ethel Waters. Familiar and passionate songs of the jazz age highlight this musical and dramatic story of Ethel Waters’ rise to fame, as she became one of the greatest artists of her generation.

Star of radio, TV, Broadway and feature film, blues woman Ethel Waters was the Halle Berry or the Beyonce of her day; a ‘superstar’ during the depression-era. As a Broadway legend and an Academy Award nominee, she could ‘shake her thang’ and delight her audiences.

ValLimar Jansen, together with Musical Director Frank Jansen, brings to the stage their “two-person, one-woman show” about this legendary performer.

Born in poverty, Ethel Waters (1896-1977) was the daughter of a 12-year-old rape victim. Ethel grew up unsupervised on the streets of Philadelphia.

“No one raised me, ” she recollected, “I just ran wild.”

She sang and danced at church functions and made her way into Black vaudeville in 1917. Appearing first in Harlem nightclubs and then crossing over into the “white time” vaudeville circuit, she became a celebrated blues singer and starred in twelve Broadway productions, ultimately becoming one of the highest paid entertainers in America. Harold Arlen wrote the song “Stormy Weather” specifically for her. She became the first African-American female to star on a national radio show and a TV series, the first to headline a show at New York’s Palace Theatre and the first to star in a dramatic play on Broadway. In her later years, Waters was nominated for an Academy Award and an Emmy. Ms. Waters became a born again Christian and toured with the Billy Graham Crusade in the last decades of her life.

ValLimar Jansen’s portrayal of this legendary singer has thrilled audiences for more than a decade. Ms. Jansen is herself noted for her vocal performances of jazz, pop, gospel and contemporary Christian music. During the course of the show, Ms. Jansen will perform fourteen of the songs made famous by Ethel Waters, among them “Stormy Weather,” “My Handy Man,” “My Handy Man Ain”™t Handy No More,” “Shake That Thing,” “Am I Blue,” and “His Eye Is on the Sparrow.”

Ms. Jansen is accompanied by husband and Musical Director Frank Jansen. A professional musician for over thirty years, he has performed with stars of Gospel, pop, Latin and R&B music.

“Sweet Mama String Bean” is the recipient of a special commendation from the Kennedy Center of the Performing Arts in Washington, D.C. Audience members already familiar with Ethel Waters will love this presentation of her story and her music. For younger audience members, the show will be a revelation.

This show is especially for anyone, young or old, who loves the blues.

WHAT: “Sweet Mama String Bean: A Celebration of Blues Woman Ethel Waters.” A musical play.
Starring ValLimar Jansen with Musical Director Frank Jansen. Produced by Kim O”™Rourke and Barbara Goodwin Masters. Directed by Nomi Limar.

Fremont Centre Theatre,
1000 Fremont Ave. (at El Centro), South Pasadena, CA 91030.

Abundant free parking behind theatre.

WHEN: May 20- 23, 2010 *ONLY*
Thurs.- Sat. at 8pm, Sun. at 3pm.
ADMISSION: $30.
RESERVATIONS: (866) 811-4111, toll-free (Theatermania).
ONLINE TICKETING here

Report by Pauline Adamek